<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<STUDY_SET>
    <STUDY accession="DRP000156" center_name="OCU-CIB" alias="DRP000156">
        <IDENTIFIERS>
            <PRIMARY_ID label="BioProject ID">PRJDA46247</PRIMARY_ID>
        </IDENTIFIERS>
        <DESCRIPTOR>
            <STUDY_TITLE>TSS Seq of Ascidian Embryos</STUDY_TITLE>
            <STUDY_TYPE new_study_type="" existing_study_type="Transcriptome Analysis"/>
            <STUDY_ABSTRACT>In mammals, CpG islands are good markers of genes because they are often
            linked to promoters. Genomic stretches with high frequencies of G+C and the CpG
            dinucleotide are observed in mammals and other vertebrates, although their contents vary
            considerably among species. CpG islands generally escape DNA methylation and tend to
            occur in the promoters of widely expressed genes. Another class of promoter has lower
            G+C and CpG contents, and is thought to be involved in the spatiotemporal regulation of
            gene expression. Invertebrates are reported to have a single class of promoter, with
            high-frequency CpG dinucleotides, suggesting that this is the original type of promoter.
            However, the limited annotation of invertebrate genes has impeded the large-scale
            analysis of their promoters. To determine the origins of the two classes of vertebrate
            promoters, we chose Ciona intestinalis, an invertebrate that is evolutionarily close to
            the vertebrates, and identified its transcription start sites genomewide using a
            next-generation sequencer. We observed high G+C and CpG contents around the
            transcription start sites, but their levels in the promoters and background sequences
            differed much less than in mammals. The CpG-rich stretches were also fairly restricted,
            so they were more similar to mammalian CpG-poor promoters than to CpG island promoters.
            From these data, we infer that CpG islands are not sufficiently ancient to be found in
            invertebrates. They probably appeared early in vertebrate evolution via some active
            mechanism and have since been maintained as part of vertebrate
            promoters.</STUDY_ABSTRACT>
            <CENTER_PROJECT_NAME>cintailb</CENTER_PROJECT_NAME>
            <RELATED_STUDIES>
                <RELATED_STUDY>
                    <RELATED_LINK>
                        <DB>bioproject</DB>
                        <ID>PRJDA46247</ID>
                        <LABEL>PRJDA46247</LABEL>
                    </RELATED_LINK>
                    <IS_PRIMARY>true</IS_PRIMARY>
                </RELATED_STUDY>
                <RELATED_STUDY>
                    <RELATED_LINK>
                        <DB>genomeprj</DB>
                        <ID>46247</ID>
                        <LABEL>46247</LABEL>
                    </RELATED_LINK>
                    <IS_PRIMARY>false</IS_PRIMARY>
                </RELATED_STUDY>
            </RELATED_STUDIES>
            <STUDY_DESCRIPTION>See above (STUDY_ABSTRACT)</STUDY_DESCRIPTION>
        </DESCRIPTOR>
        <STUDY_LINKS>
            <STUDY_LINK>
                <URL_LINK>
                    <LABEL>Linked publication</LABEL>
                    <URL>http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-S3-S7</URL>
                </URL_LINK>
            </STUDY_LINK>
        </STUDY_LINKS>
    </STUDY>
</STUDY_SET>
