<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<STUDY_SET xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <STUDY alias="ena-STUDY-INRA-CMSE-30-04-2015-08:39:22:878-147" center_name="UMR Agroecology, INRA - Burgundy University, Dijon, France" accession="ERP010313">
    <IDENTIFIERS>
      <PRIMARY_ID>ERP010313</PRIMARY_ID>
      <EXTERNAL_ID namespace="BioProject">PRJEB9228</EXTERNAL_ID>
      <SUBMITTER_ID namespace="INRA-CMSE">ena-STUDY-INRA-CMSE-30-04-2015-08:39:22:878-147</SUBMITTER_ID>
      <SUBMITTER_ID namespace="UMR Agroecology, INRA - Burgundy University, Dijon, France">ena-STUDY-INRA-CMSE-30-04-2015-08:39:22:878-147</SUBMITTER_ID>
    </IDENTIFIERS>
    <DESCRIPTOR>
      <STUDY_TITLE>FT-IR spectroscopy: A powerful tool for studying the inter- and intraspecific biodiversity of cultivable non-Saccharomyces yeasts isolated from grape must</STUDY_TITLE>
      <STUDY_TYPE existing_study_type="Other"/>
      <STUDY_ABSTRACT>The efficiency of the FT-IR technique for studying the inter- and intra biodiversity of cultivable non-Saccharomyces yeasts (NS) present in differentmust samples was examined. In first, the capacity of the technique FT-IR to study the global diversity of a given sample was compared to the pyrosequencing method, used as a reference technique. Seven different genera (Aureobasidium, Candida, Cryptococcus, Hanseniaspora, Issatchenkia, Metschnikowia and Pichia) were identified by FT-IR and also by pyrosequencing. Thirty-eight other genera were identified by pyrosequencing, but together they represented less than 6% of the average total population of 6 musts. Among the species identified, some of thempresent organoleptic potentials inwinemaking, particularly Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina). So in a second time, we evaluated the capacity of the FT-IR technique to discriminate the isolates of this species because few techniques were able to study intraspecific NS yeast biodiversity. The results obtained were validated by using a classic method as ITS sequencing. Biodiversity at strain level was high: 19 different strains were identified from 58 isolates. So, FT-IR spectroscopy seems to be an accurate and reliable method for identifying major genera present in themusts. The two biggest advantages of the FT-IR are the capacity to characterize intraspecific biodiversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts and the possibility to discriminate a lot of strains.</STUDY_ABSTRACT>
      <CENTER_PROJECT_NAME>FTIR_FUNGI</CENTER_PROJECT_NAME>
      <STUDY_DESCRIPTION>The efficiency of the FT-IR technique for studying the inter- and intra biodiversity of cultivable non-Saccharomyces yeasts (NS) present in differentmust samples was examined. In first, the capacity of the technique FT-IR to study the global diversity of a given sample was compared to the pyrosequencing method, used as a reference technique. Seven different genera (Aureobasidium, Candida, Cryptococcus, Hanseniaspora, Issatchenkia, Metschnikowia and Pichia) were identified by FT-IR and also by pyrosequencing. Thirty-eight other genera were identified by pyrosequencing, but together they represented less than 6% of the average total population of 6 musts. Among the species identified, some of thempresent organoleptic potentials inwinemaking, particularly Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina). So in a second time, we evaluated the capacity of the FT-IR technique to discriminate the isolates of this species because few techniques were able to study intraspecific NS yeast biodiversity. The results obtained were validated by using a classic method as ITS sequencing. Biodiversity at strain level was high: 19 different strains were identified from 58 isolates. So, FT-IR spectroscopy seems to be an accurate and reliable method for identifying major genera present in themusts. The two biggest advantages of the FT-IR are the capacity to characterize intraspecific biodiversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts and the possibility to discriminate a lot of strains.</STUDY_DESCRIPTION>
    </DESCRIPTOR>
    <STUDY_LINKS>
      <STUDY_LINK>
        <XREF_LINK>
          <DB>PUBMED</DB>
          <ID>26688103</ID>
        </XREF_LINK>
      </STUDY_LINK>
    </STUDY_LINKS>
  </STUDY>
</STUDY_SET>
