<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<STUDY_SET xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <STUDY xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" alias="qiita_sid_10423" center_name="University of California San Diego Microbiome Initiative" accession="ERP014651">
    <IDENTIFIERS>
      <PRIMARY_ID>ERP014651</PRIMARY_ID>
      <EXTERNAL_ID namespace="BioProject">PRJEB13115</EXTERNAL_ID>
      <SUBMITTER_ID namespace="UCSDMI">qiita_sid_10423</SUBMITTER_ID>
      <SUBMITTER_ID namespace="University of California San Diego Microbiome Initiative">qiita_sid_10423</SUBMITTER_ID>
    </IDENTIFIERS>
    <DESCRIPTOR>
      <STUDY_TITLE>Geography and location are the primary drivers of office microbiome composition</STUDY_TITLE>
      <STUDY_TYPE existing_study_type="Other"/>
      <STUDY_ABSTRACT>In the United States, humans spend the majority of their time indoors where they are exposed to the microbiome of the built environment (BE) they inhabit. Despite the ubiquity of microbes in BEs, and their potential impacts on health and building materials, basic questions about the microbiology of these environments remain unanswered. We present a study on the impacts of geography, material type, human interaction, location in a room, seasonal variation, and indoor and microenvironmental parameters on bacterial communities in offices. Our data elucidates several important features of microbial communities in BEs. First, under normal office environmental conditions, bacterial communities do not differ based on surface material (e.g., ceiling tile or carpet), but do differ based on the location in a room (e.g., ceiling or floor), two features which are often conflated, but which we are able to separate here. We suspect that previous work showing differences in bacterial composition with surface material were likely detecting differences based on different usage patterns. Next, we find that offices have city-specific bacterial communities, such that we can accurately predict which city an office microbiome sample is derived from, but office-specific bacterial communities are less apparent. This differs from previous work which has suggested office-specific compositions of bacterial communities. We again suspect that the difference from prior work arises from different usage patterns. As has been previously shown, we observe that human skin contributes heavily to the composition of BE surfaces.</STUDY_ABSTRACT>
      <CENTER_PROJECT_NAME>OFFICE ACCESSION STUDY</CENTER_PROJECT_NAME>
      <STUDY_DESCRIPTION>In the United States, humans spend the majority of their time indoors where they are exposed to the microbiome of the built environment (BE) they inhabit. Despite the ubiquity of microbes in BEs, and their potential impacts on health and building materials, basic questions about the microbiology of these environments remain unanswered. We present a study on the impacts of geography, material type, human interaction, location in a room, seasonal variation, and indoor and microenvironmental parameters on bacterial communities in offices. Our data elucidates several important features of microbial communities in BEs. First, under normal office environmental conditions, bacterial communities do not differ based on surface material (e.g., ceiling tile or carpet), but do differ based on the location in a room (e.g., ceiling or floor), two features which are often conflated, but which we are able to separate here. We suspect that previous work showing differences in bacterial composition with surface material were likely detecting differences based on different usage patterns. Next, we find that offices have city-specific bacterial communities, such that we can accurately predict which city an office microbiome sample is derived from, but office-specific bacterial communities are less apparent. This differs from previous work which has suggested office-specific compositions of bacterial communities. We again suspect that the difference from prior work arises from different usage patterns. As has been previously shown, we observe that human skin contributes heavily to the composition of BE surfaces.</STUDY_DESCRIPTION>
    </DESCRIPTOR>
  </STUDY>
</STUDY_SET>
